Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jon B's avatar

I randomly decided to read the Odyssey in the summer of 2023. I happened to have just finished reading "Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States" by James Scott. It's about the formation of the Sumerian city-states and agriculture. Having that book in recent memory was very illuminating for the Odyssey's chapter on the island of the Cyclops.

The Cyclops were just hunter-gatherers, a society that was not controlled by a noble elite and harnessed for agriculture. Hunter-gatherers were labeled barbarians, and said to be horrible and lawless and evil, because farmers kept leaving their city-states and joining the barbarians. It was just a much better life. So the nobles created a lot of propaganda to say the barbarians were bad.

This is why the Odyssey repeatedly says the Cyclops were horrible (despite them not doing anything horrible), and repeatedly notes that they did not grow grain or wine. Without the background knowledge of early city-state labor politics, the text's fixation on the Cyclops' lack of grain would've been really random and weird, but it makes total sense in context.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts